Read on Twitter
I've always been 'meh' on Liz Cheney:
1. She's leveraged her father's network to get where she is in politics
2. She's an apparatchik of the DC Establishment
3. Her efforts to distinguish herself are always poorly chosen
But after 3+ years of NYT publishing at least 1 lie/day? https://twitter.com/Liz_Cheney/status/1277200077724037122
1. She's leveraged her father's network to get where she is in politics
2. She's an apparatchik of the DC Establishment
3. Her efforts to distinguish herself are always poorly chosen
But after 3+ years of NYT publishing at least 1 lie/day? https://twitter.com/Liz_Cheney/status/1277200077724037122
You'd have to be way above average stupid to make the tweet she did today.
She's helping to lay a foundation AGAINST @realDonaldTrump to be used at the convention.
The DC Establishment THINKS they have a chance to unseat @POTUS by throwing shite against the wall NOW.
She's helping to lay a foundation AGAINST @realDonaldTrump to be used at the convention.
The DC Establishment THINKS they have a chance to unseat @POTUS by throwing shite against the wall NOW.
Ms. Cheney is throwing out a lifeline to the NYT on a story drowning under the weight of it's own lies.
She's providing comfort & solace to the NYT when she could have easily remained silent.
You know who else is connected to the Republican DC Establishment?
@TuckerCarlson
She's providing comfort & solace to the NYT when she could have easily remained silent.
You know who else is connected to the Republican DC Establishment?
@TuckerCarlson
Who has been awfully eager of late to proffer really stupid political advice to @realDonaldTrump while at the same time telling the world he's LOSING the election.
WHY are these two rabble rousing NOW?
Easy, the first of Durham's indictments are coming SOON.
And at some point?
WHY are these two rabble rousing NOW?
Easy, the first of Durham's indictments are coming SOON.
And at some point?
Don't die of shock if some DC Establishment Republicans are among the indictments.
Everybody knows the indictments may kill the Democratic party
It's why the Democrats have been willing to burn the parts of the country they control down (while freeing the responsible criminals)
Everybody knows the indictments may kill the Democratic party
It's why the Democrats have been willing to burn the parts of the country they control down (while freeing the responsible criminals)
Lots of folks on Twitter have been asking:
"Where are the Republicans? Why aren't they denouncing the Democrats from the rooftops?"
Have you folks forgotten the fact there is only the UniParty, where some pretend to be Democrats while others pretend to be Republicans?
@COsweda
"Where are the Republicans? Why aren't they denouncing the Democrats from the rooftops?"
Have you folks forgotten the fact there is only the UniParty, where some pretend to be Democrats while others pretend to be Republicans?
@COsweda
Haven't you noticed that AG Barr keeps adding more & MORE U.S. Attorneys he trusts to the burgeoning "Durham Investigation"?
He's not adding AUSA's or even the standard line attorneys
He's adding Big Guns capable of running major criminal conspiracy cases each unique on its own
He's not adding AUSA's or even the standard line attorneys
He's adding Big Guns capable of running major criminal conspiracy cases each unique on its own
BTW, each of those U.S. Attorneys can add whatever staff to their investigation as they see fit.
Have you noticed they come from all over the country?
Are you aware a Federal conspiracy investigation can seat a Grand Jury WHEREEVER it sees fit?
@drawandstrike @COsweda
Have you noticed they come from all over the country?
Are you aware a Federal conspiracy investigation can seat a Grand Jury WHEREEVER it sees fit?
@drawandstrike @COsweda
If I wanted to prosecute Republican politicians for Federal crimes?
I'd seat their Grand Juries in Dem leaning locations.
If I wanted to prosecute Democratic politicians for Federal crimes?
I'd seat their Grand Juries in Republican leaning locations.
You know what else?
I'd seat their Grand Juries in Dem leaning locations.
If I wanted to prosecute Democratic politicians for Federal crimes?
I'd seat their Grand Juries in Republican leaning locations.
You know what else?
As of this past week, Trump has appointed 200 Federal judges.
That's roughly 25% of all Federal judgeships
The only one who has appointed more?
George Washington
That makes it feasible, for the first time in a very long time, to ...
@shipwreckedcrew https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/one-in-every-four-circuit-court-judges-is-now-a-trump-appointee/2019/12/21/d6fa1e98-2336-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html
That's roughly 25% of all Federal judgeships
The only one who has appointed more?
George Washington
That makes it feasible, for the first time in a very long time, to ...
@shipwreckedcrew https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/one-in-every-four-circuit-court-judges-is-now-a-trump-appointee/2019/12/21/d6fa1e98-2336-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html
What's that phrase again?
DRAIN THE SWAMP
Politically, indicting Republicans or Democrats just before an election has been a No-No for DOJ for obvious reasons.
But indicting Republicans AND Democrats just before an election?
Especially for REALLY egregious crimes?
That works
DRAIN THE SWAMP
Politically, indicting Republicans or Democrats just before an election has been a No-No for DOJ for obvious reasons.
But indicting Republicans AND Democrats just before an election?
Especially for REALLY egregious crimes?
That works
Besides, you don't have to charge EVERYBODY before the election.
Just the one's you have NAILED for really NASTY things "beyond a shadow of a doubt".
And what if I told you this ALL fits into a larger PLAN?
A plan that incorporates the SWAMP's secret plans?
Just the one's you have NAILED for really NASTY things "beyond a shadow of a doubt".
And what if I told you this ALL fits into a larger PLAN?
A plan that incorporates the SWAMP's secret plans?
