1/ Why does anyone listen to Fauci? And why give any weight to his predictions about Covid 15 months from now?

We should be skeptical of people with narrow risk perspectives and objectively poor track records.

Let’s take a look at his. https://mobile.twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/1304533190133022722
3/ But anyone with a flexible mental model of Covid and an eye on trends knew his claims were bogus. Fast forward a month and the situations had reversed. Metrics plummeting in the US as new cases surging in Europe.

Predictable for anyone but Fauci. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/21/world/europe/coronavirus-second-wave.html
5/ Media and politicians, of course, jumped on Fauci’s words and hammered GOP governors in the Sunbelt who dared to have comprehensive risk perspectives and implement a semblance of balance. But how’d they do? Here’s Arizona, Florida, and Texas. No shutdowns necessary.
6/ Surely Fauci updated his thinking/mental model after the Sunbelt’s dramatic improvement with minimal restrictions, right? Nope. Here he is still using case numbers after the @nytimes article showing that nearly 90% of PCR cases aren’t infectious. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1239096
7/ Perhaps he’s just too busy to read new studies, look at robust global data, recognize repeating global patterns showing burnout at a low threshold, look at empirical evidence, or to consider other risks as American lives are lost and devastated by our response. Maybe.
8/ Or, perhaps he has a penchant for succumbing to and feeding hysterias. Here’s a passage from The Pandemic Century by Honigsbaum. Here we find one Anthony Fauci disregarding the CDC and running with sensationalist and false claims from a bad AIDS study. Enter AIDS Hysteria.
9/ He also comes off quite poorly in And the Band Played On by Shilts. Why? Because he saw a risk, panicked, and did not lead with a level head. He allowed himself to give into fear and to shift away from a comprehensive risk perspective to a dangerous narrow risk perspective.
10/ I ask again, why are letting a bureaucrat like Fauci - who has a track record of making inaccurate predictions, who has an inaccurate and biased mental model of Covid (that he has not updated), and who is *not* assessing risks comprehensively - tell us what do?

No more.
Edit: Why are *^we^* letting a bureaucrat like Fauci tell us what to do?
You can follow @19_phd.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.