1/4

#cardano needs pool ranking mechanism - but just NOT the one we all think it really needs. 👀🤔

$ada #stakepools need ranking based on what I refer to as:

"d-index,"

which ranks pools based primarily on how much they contribute to the decentralised nature of the network.
2/4

Since we all know that all k pools will even out over the long-run in terms of stake returns - we need to look beyond this arbitrary incentive program to ensure desired variety.

Network doesn't really need 10 operators running 100 pools each to saturate k number of pools.
3/4

It is rather safe to assume that we are better off with more operators running less pools each instead (following the logic - 1000:1).

The assumption is that these operators are competent because they are able to produce desirable rewards to delegators in the first place.
4/4

I am open to suggestions to say what and how such "d-index" could be calculated most accurately without creating massive barrier to entry either.

This could be with regards to # of pools operated, total # of unique delegators, or to the amount of pledge delegated.
You can follow @crypto_fay.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.