We calculate distributions of change in different variables, like the Transient Climate Response (a comparable measure for how much a model warms due to CO2 🏭). Weighting can considerably shift these distributions and increase their skill.

2/🧵
We find the multi-model distributions of Transient Climate Response as well as future warming to be shifted downward by applying the combined performance-independence weights. Decisive climate action is still needed but the most extreme warming might be less realistic. 🌡️

3/🧵
Our results hold for both, the low emission pathway SSP1-2.6 as well as the high emission pathway SSP5-8.5 and during the entire 21st century. 📈

4/🧵
A large effect comes from several high-warming models (orange labels) receiving systematically lower weights.

5/🧵
What about independence of information (when calculating statistics)? Some climate models are "related" due to, e.g., shared components. We identify them based on their output, cluster them in a #CMIP6 family tree 🌳, and account for the dependence.

6/🧵
Evaluation of the method: since there are no observations from the future we use all the last-generation #CMIP5 models as pseudo observations. Median skill increases for all cases by 12-22%! 💪

7/🧵
We also provide additional information such as weights and warming per model in the supplement to our study. 📊🤓
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-995-2020-supplement

8/🧵
Thanks a lot to all the collaborators in this project! 🙏 @apuffycloud @ClimateFlavors @AnnaMerrifield1 Ruth Lorenz and @Knutti_ETH

Thanks also to @EU_H2020 for funding @EUCP_H2020 & @CRESCENDO_H2020 and to all the data and software providers!

/end
You can follow @luki_brunner.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.