Read on Twitter
Thread:
Refuting this ignorant individual who thinks he has it all sorted out https://twitter.com/deadlycause/status/1333771182147993600
Refuting this ignorant individual who thinks he has it all sorted out https://twitter.com/deadlycause/status/1333771182147993600
first claim about tawheed is nonsensical and shows fault in logic. The oneness of Allah doesn’t imply he cannot interact with creation, this person gives no reason to state so, in fact with the presupposition of an all powerful being, such is possible and that is valid and sound.
Even if we assumed we can’t have contact with God, which is false, that doesn’t imply atheism, but deism. That’s just a side note. Other than that, there is no reason to take what he said seriously.
The second thing he says is just fallacious, he already presupposes that the prophet is a false prophet without establishing so, and then goes on with that. I’m sure we all know how that is faulty.
Regarding prophetic witnesses, Muslims are more critical than Jews and Christians regarding the authenticity of the books, thus before we look through the contents of previous books to see if the prophet is mentioned, we establish its authenticity.
The Bible clearly fails in this regard as there is no way to establish its reliability and you can’t even trace it back to the apostles, even doing so, we have no idea who the apostles are.
The Quran is a revelation from allah, it is not a creation neither is it eternal. For that we say that this is absolutely fine. The problem is that you limit this to two choices and establish your argument based on that. Absolutely deceptive
Here he says it’s a terrible book because “it contradicts previous prophets”. While he doesn’t notice it, this is fallacious as well as he presupposes previous books about the prophets hold authority or are a criteria without establishing so.
Remarkably, by the testimony of the linguistics and Arabs at the time, the Quran surpassed all criteria’s and even revolutionized the Arabic language and became a basis for it in every regard. Whether it’s the style, the grammar and more!
This ignorant clearly doesn’t understand the gems of the Quran.
The story of Jesus being raised and being appeared as if he was killed was something Allah talks about. Allah planned and he’s the best of planners, and for that this story is a demonstration of the power and light of Allah. Truly remarkable!
No this is pathetic, he holds an arbitrary criteria that Adam needs to be called Gods word by name. This is faulty as we can simply say this is directly derived already from the Quran.
As the Quran says:
Verily, the likeness of 'Iesa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.
Verily, the likeness of 'Iesa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.
There is no need of him being labeled as Gods word when it is clear that this is the explanation of what is meant by Gods word.
Apparently it’s an issue that only Jesus is called this, when it’s truly not. It’s him clutching at straws, as Ibn domaines in the previous verse, it’s that simple.
He then points that in Islam, Jesus is a failure as he didn’t get too many followers. This couldn’t be further from the truth, Jesus is not a failure as his job is not done in Islam, and will ultimately be the savior!
Anyways we have stories of prophets like Noah who didn’t get many prophets as well but still aren’t failures, this is your own deriving.
The point he put for the Jews getting angry at him is funny, because according to their narrative, Jesus confirmed the prophecies as well but the Jews still chased him! This is irrelevant anyways and it has no point.
Then he talks about the Quran saying “no one can change his word”. If I said something, and someone then writes it down then corrupts it, this doesn’t change my word. My word remains as is in the literal sense.
But apparently, according to him, if I take a Bible right now, and erase some words, I overpowered God now! What a joke.
Anyways this was pretty easy, none of these are challenging. Christians like him stab Christian apologetics in the back. Remember guys, there is not one single good argument against Islam.
17.81-82.
And say: "The truth has come, and falsehood has vanished. Surely falsehood is ever bound to vanish by its very nature.” And We send down of the Qur'an that which is healing and mercy for the believers, but it does not increase the wrongdoers except in loss.
And say: "The truth has come, and falsehood has vanished. Surely falsehood is ever bound to vanish by its very nature.” And We send down of the Qur'an that which is healing and mercy for the believers, but it does not increase the wrongdoers except in loss.
