Read on Twitter
Wisconsin's response to Sidney Powell's lawsuit points out that the Dominion voting machine she says were part of a big election-rigging plot weren't used in most of the counties she's complaining about, and in the two that did use them, Trump won.
The filing is notable because it engages with the "overwhelming" evidence Powell and others claim to have assembled proving the election was stolen. Although that evidence occupies many pages, it ain't great.
Four of Powell's main exhibits "are 'expert' analyses conducted by anonymous individuals whose credentials - or even existence - cannot be tested or assessed." One is an analysis of election technology by a person claiming to have a degree on physiology.
Including an affidavit from the guy behind QAnon remains a puzzling strategic choice, but seems entirely in keeping with the rest of the Kraken litigation.
This. This is what they are offering up as evidence that the election was rigged and that people were violating Wisconsin's absentee voting laws. This is like what you see on Reddit, only in the guise of expert testimony.
"The Ramsland affidavit claims that it is statistically improbable that a large number of ballots favoring Biden would be reported at one time, but contains virtually every flaw a statistical analysis can have."
Swing and a miss.
Here's the filing, which would make good reading for people who are buying these theories.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.55.0.pdf
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.92717/gov.uscourts.wied.92717.55.0.pdf
The DNC has filed something similar. "Many of the supposed evidentiary sources are 'redacted,' so we have no idea who (or what) is feeding these tales to Mr. Feehan's credulous lawyers."
