What actually is a Pod in Kubernetes?
If you ever read at least a little about Kubernetes or followed a simple tutorial, you must have come across the term "Pod".
In case you're still wondering what it is, this thread is for you!

If you ever read at least a little about Kubernetes or followed a simple tutorial, you must have come across the term "Pod".
In case you're still wondering what it is, this thread is for you!



A Pod is the smallest deployable unit in Kubernetes.
It's a group of one or more containers that form a logical local host. They share their storage, their network, are always co-located and co-scheduled.
The most common use case is having a Pod with exactly one container. Having multiple containers within a Pod is usually a pretty advanced use-case.
So, naively spoken, a Pod is often only a wrapper around one container.
So, naively spoken, a Pod is often only a wrapper around one container.
Nearly everything in Kubernetes is an object. Objects are persistent entities within the Kubernetes system.
A Pod is one of the most primitive objects Kubernetes can handle and is a fundamental building block. It is used by many other more advanced objects.
A Pod is one of the most primitive objects Kubernetes can handle and is a fundamental building block. It is used by many other more advanced objects.
A Pod can also contain so-called init-containers. Those containers are run before the actual containers of the Pod are started, and are then shut down again.
One of the most common use-cases for an init-container is waiting for required resources to become available.
One of the most common use-cases for an init-container is waiting for required resources to become available.
Many micro services need some sort of connection to a database. That logic can be put into an init-container which polls for a database to be available.
If the database is available, the init-container shuts down successfully and the actual container can start.
If the database is available, the init-container shuts down successfully and the actual container can start.


As we've already learned, a Pod is a fundamental building block of Kubernetes which doesn't handle raw containers but instead takes a container and always wraps it with a Pod.
This design actually has certain advantages. Even if a Pod does only contain one container, it can be seen as an abstraction that can in return be implemented in several ways.
Why? Well, Kubernetes supports multiple runtimes.
There are runtimes that support Pods themselves, and there are others which don't. No matter what runtime you use, all you see is Pods, and the underlying implementation is basically hidden from you.
There are runtimes that support Pods themselves, and there are others which don't. No matter what runtime you use, all you see is Pods, and the underlying implementation is basically hidden from you.
The other advantage is that there's always a Pod. Not a Container (A SingleContainerPod) and a Pod (a MultiContainerPod). The amount of containers running doesn't matter anymore, as only Pod handling needs to be implemented by Kubernetes.
And on a user-level, this also is advantageous. All you need to deploy is a Pod. You don't need to deploy a container if there's only one, and a Pod if there are multiple containers. This makes the handling easier for you, and that's a great thing for developer experience!


As long as you have a container at hand, which is pushed to a registry, that your cluster can reach, you're good to go.
You can take a look at the Pod example spec shown below to get an idea of how it looks.
You could send this spec off to your Kubernetes cluster by calling
kubectl apply -f pod.yaml
and Kubernetes would immediately start with its work.
The control plane components will first take the spec and save it to the object storage (etcd).
kubectl apply -f pod.yaml
and Kubernetes would immediately start with its work.
The control plane components will first take the spec and save it to the object storage (etcd).
Another component will then process the spec and check if it already has the image at hand. If not, it will pull it from the registry, and then deploy the Pod to the cluster.
After that a kubelet on a certain node, which is selected based on information like the ...
After that a kubelet on a certain node, which is selected based on information like the ...
... resources available and more, is instructed to deploy the Pod and with that the container associated with it.
Three seconds after the Pod was actually started, Kubernetes will try to check if the Pod is actually ready.
Three seconds after the Pod was actually started, Kubernetes will try to check if the Pod is actually ready.
After three seconds a HTTP GET request is sent to the HTTP endpoint specified within your Pod template, and on receiving a successful HTTP status code, the Pod will be reported to be alive.
Then finally, your Pod is running and ready to be used!
Then finally, your Pod is running and ready to be used!
Every three seconds, Kubernetes will check in with the same endpoint to see if the Pod is still alive. If that request ever fails, Kubernetes will consider the Pod dead, kill it, and then restart it again.


That's an interesting question! You can, of course, use Pods to deploy your applications, but you shouldn't.
Although you can tell Kubernetes to deploy a "raw pod", there are more advanced objects like Deployments, Jobs, or DaemonSets, ...
... which offer way more functionality than a basic Pod. And they all use Pods under the hood, next to their advanced functionality.
It's good to know what a Pod is, and how to use it, but in the end, you'll mostly work with other objects.
It's good to know what a Pod is, and how to use it, but in the end, you'll mostly work with other objects.
See a Pod as the fundamental building block that it is, and play around with it a little to get used to what you can do with it.
But other than that, if you ever think about deploying something to production, better take a look at more advanced workflow objects.
But other than that, if you ever think about deploying something to production, better take a look at more advanced workflow objects.