An excellent conversation, check out the video.

One aspect drawing much attention was how the McCarrick Report revealed the dysfunction of the secretive and problematic process for choosing bishops.

I examined that further in my latest column:

https://sacredheartuniversity.typepad.com/go_rebuild_my_house/2020/12/selecting-shepherds-.html https://twitter.com/GUcstpubliclife/status/1338555677497757698
What struck me most about the McCarrick Report is that virtually anyone--Catholic or not--knows how the Bishop of Rome, THE POPE, is elected.

Virtually no one knows how their local bishop is chosen.

Both @Cindy_Wooden and @ricdssj have excellent explainers of the process...
...But the reality is that ideal bishops selection process is easily and often subverted. A single curial official can thwart the warnings of a cardinal, or a disgruntled churchman like Viganò is "punished" w/exile to DC as nuncio--and gatekeeper for all episcopal appts.
A system that thrives on secrecy rather than confidentiality, and one that is so complex that no one knows how it works, or if it works, is a bad system.

Personnel will always be policy--good priests, good bishops, a good pope picking them, is always critically important...
You can follow @GibsonWrites.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.