So excited to share the latest work from my thesis - how do we go about rationally designing antimicrobial targeted prodrugs and does it even matter? (hint- it should)

A huge thanks to all the folks who have collaborated on this and made it possible.

A đŸ§”-
/1 https://twitter.com/biorxivpreprint/status/1339008721847017472
We know antimicrobial resistance is going to be a huge. Surprisingly few antimicrobials target metabolic processes because the inhibitors you'd need to make are hard to get into cells (= no ☠). If we could get them in, we could hugely expand the druggable space.
/2
Lipophilic ester prodrugging is a common med chem technique and seemingly gives free cellular entry to a lot of polar anti-metabolite drugs (yay!).

Why don't we just do that then? Unfortunately human esterases like to chew apart these prodrugs, erasing all the above benefits.
I know what you're saying now, Justin- I learned that esterases are super promiscuous, there's no way you'll be able to target prodrug activation to a specific esterase by just switching the prodrug substrate around.
/4
In one of the *coolest* experiments in my graduate career (the result of a lunch with @eamueller_) we show that the identity of an ester promoiety dramatically affects the rate of prodrug activation in whole cells (we have movies!).
/5
Ok, so promoieties matter. Can we design one that is selectively activated by microbes?

First we have to know which bacterial esterase we're aiming for. Using 2(F+R)genetic screens, we find that 2 esterases are responsible for activation of carboxyester prodrugs in S. aureus
/6
(GloB and FrmB). While the native cellular role of these enzymes is slightly hazy (probably cellular detoxification?) we show that they moonlight as prodrug activators!

Note- we've previously described GloB's role in prodrug activation here- https://twitter.com/odomjohnlab/status/1322138900287148032?s=20
/7
Next, we wanted to see what types of promoieties GloB and FrmB may be able to cleave. Using a 32-compound substrate library, we make a decent start at establishing the specificity of these esterases.
/8
However, the world of chemistry is huge and 32 compounds isn't going to cut it. It would be great to have a crystal structure so we can rationally design new substrates. With help from the Jez lab (@ WUSTL) we solved the structures of BOTH FrmB and GloB!
/9
With structure-guided design now possible, we wanted to turn back to the question "does any of this actually matter for humans?". Using the same 32-compound substrate library, we sin against the 10 enzyme commandments set forth by Arthur Kornberg, and screen whole human and
/10
mouse sera to determine ester substrate preferences. We find that 1) mouse sera =/= human sera, begging the question, are mice really an appropriate model for human prodrug studies? and 2) there are differences between whole sera preferences and GloB and FrmB preferences!
/11
In short, targeting prodrugs to S. aureus (and probably microbes in general) *should be possible*. TONS of follow-up questions on the underlying biology of these two enzymes, prodrug transit in microbes, the genus/species differences in activation. Also, making the compounds!
/12
So excited to see what comes next from this amazing team, and so happy to have had help from the amazing labs of @pauljplanet, Dowd Lab, @Muller_Lab, Jez Lab, @PetraLevin and of course my mentor @odomjohnlab!
/fin
You can follow @justin_j_miller.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.