Why De Bruyne has the potential to be considered better than Kaka[A THREAD]:
(likes and rts appreciated)
(likes and rts appreciated)
First of all lets see the major trophies won by each:
Kaka: 2x domestic league,1x UCL,1x World Cup
KDB:2x domestic league
So we see KDB is just 1 UCL away from matching his legacy.But a World Cup will be really hard as Belgium don't have quality and depth like Brazil always do
Kaka: 2x domestic league,1x UCL,1x World Cup
KDB:2x domestic league
So we see KDB is just 1 UCL away from matching his legacy.But a World Cup will be really hard as Belgium don't have quality and depth like Brazil always do
KDB was a part of the City team that achieved 100 points for first time in English football and the one which did a domestic quadraple the next season for the first time in English football.
Kaka wasn't part of any record breaking domestic squads which did a "first" something
Kaka wasn't part of any record breaking domestic squads which did a "first" something
Stats in European top 5 league +respective domestic cups+UCL:
Kaka 426 apps
133 goals
124 assists
257 G+A in 426 apps
KDB 361 apps
90 goals
152 assists
242 G+A in 361 apps
KDB of course has a better rate than Kaka im G/A and is likely to beat Kaka's tally easily
Kaka 426 apps
133 goals
124 assists
257 G+A in 426 apps
KDB 361 apps
90 goals
152 assists
242 G+A in 361 apps
KDB of course has a better rate than Kaka im G/A and is likely to beat Kaka's tally easily
Kaka played as an AM and a second striker mostly,and sometimes he was played as a winger too.
While De Bruyne started his career as a CM and then went onto play AM . He's equally adept in both the postions
While De Bruyne started his career as a CM and then went onto play AM . He's equally adept in both the postions
According to the above information in last 2 tweets Kaka being the more attacking player should have a better G/A per 90 rate ,but that's not the case, KDB has the better rate even though he plays deeper which really proves his excellence