Read on Twitter
Totally random thought. But how many pro sports teams have essentially 'violent/damaging' names or mascots? I get that in contact sports or any sports you MIGHT want to come across as being somebody not to mess with but anyways...
NRL teams. Up for debate but whatevs...
tick = Seriously aggressive/scary/can cause death
dash = can attack things and cause harm
dot = just doing it's job/not particularly harmful
*Rabbitohs are rabbit hunters for the record
tick = Seriously aggressive/scary/can cause death
dash = can attack things and cause harm
dot = just doing it's job/not particularly harmful
*Rabbitohs are rabbit hunters for the record
NBA East... purely subjective... seems a bit less aggressive than NRL. I am going in to this with an open mind. Will I stumble across an astonishingly murderous league? ...
The NBA West is really not very scary. I mean I even gave the Suns a potentially scary mark cos you know, climate change and sun burn... it's ramping up.
A-League is seriously not scary. I guess most football/soccer leagues are going to be like this because of the United/FC prevalence.
Women's Super Smash. I should add that question marks which I used previous mean that it COULD be used for good or bad... Harry Potter Styles...
Men's Super Smash. Volt's can kill the hell out of you but generally just meant to light your room while you read these shit tweets.
Super Rugby = mediocre
NHL West, East, North, and Central. A Bruin is apparently an English folk term for a Brown Bear. A senator can be awesome or be a piece of shit. The Central league is a bit dangerous. Fear them.
So far the NRL is coming across as really effing violent. But I'm watching the Curry Cup final and I wish you good morning and see you tomorrow.
But I better chuck this in. This comp is a bit aggro. Might need to lax a bit.
