I'm interested in perspectives on the science of learning that highlight areas of critique, caution or nuance. Perspectives that ask us to take a closer look. Here's what I've found so far. I'd be interested in further recommendations!

Please RT.

1/9
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/cognitive-science-needs-fair-scepticism/

@CatScutt

'Cognitive science does not provide a recipe for what teachers should do, but rather should inform their repertoire of approaches. And of course, it forms only one part of teachers’ extensive knowledge and expertise.'

5/9
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/#CriCogSci

'Human thought is inherently social in ways that cognitive science ignores.'

7/9
http://www.nickdennis.com/blog/2020/03/01/the-educational-research-issue-in-english-education/

@nickdennis

'The problem with this approach is that education and teaching is not just one thing at a time. It can be many different things and even contradictory things.'

9/9
You can follow @hannahtyreman.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.