Read on Twitter
when people stop talking about "nonbinary" as if it equals androgynous, unaligned, not transitioning, etc. you will grow to understand that extremely few trans people could ever fit into the category of "binary" in the ways a cis person could
discussions of this seem to have the issue of falling back on being far too prescriptivist, you will never be able to lump people together based solely upon birth assignment, pronouns, or even femininity vs masculinity. none of these descriptors are coherent classes of people
what *can* be done, however, is gaining an understanding of how (trans)misogyny and homo/lesbophobia work as material forces, and especially how they interact w race, because these are what dictate trans people's experiences and how we each navigate ourselves and the world.
i guarantee most of these discussions would go a lot smoother if we stopped trying to find issues in binary vs nonbinary, they/them vs she/her or he/him, and instead understand our experiences as a composite of material forces enacted upon us.
We absolutely need to have discussions that examine the nuance of differing trans experience, and especially one that doesn't flatten transmisogyny into vague all encompassing transphobia, however if we want to avoid recreating these same structures we must examine & rebuke them
