One reason that more American universities don't have "War Studies" departments is that the study of war is integrated into the subfields of political, social, economic, and cultural history in ways unimaginable forty or fifty years ago.
In This Republic of Suffering, she offered a major reinterpretation of death and the Civil War, a project that Hastings's mentor, Sir Michael Howard, would surely have found worthy of the genre. https://www.google.com/books/edition/This_Republic_of_Suffering/0Ng-hNXC1P0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
Let's not forget Beth Bailey, whose book America's Army, published by Harvard University Press is a major contribution to modern American history. BTW, she is also coauthor of one of the most widely used American history textbooks. https://history.ku.edu/beth-bailey 
I spent 24 years on the faculty at Penn, where my colleagues Walter MacDougall, Arthur Waldron, and Peter Holquist, to name three, regularly wrote about and taught military history. Intellectual historian Warren Breckman at Penn is writing a book on World War I.
My current department, @NYUHistory, offers courses on the Crusades, US Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Cold War, the Vietnam War and more. We have a two-year visiting position in military history that has brought some amazing scholars to our department over the years.
I could pile on and on, but just off the top of my head, here are a few scholars of military history whose work I admire, Fred Logevall, Harvard; Mark Bradley, Chicago; Monica Kim, Wisconsin-Madison; Richard Immerman, Temple; Brian DeLay, Berkeley.
You can follow @TomSugrue.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.