This won’t be a revelation to most of my followers, but perhaps if you share this post, it'll find its way to those out there who are still wondering about this question: IS CYBERSPACE A LEGAL VACUUM?

Spoiler alert: no it isn’t.

A brief thread: 🧵

/1
However, it simply isn’t true that “there are no rules of engagement in cyberspace”.

/5
At least since 2013, there is a global consensus that international law applies in cyberspace. That includes the U.N. Charter, which codifies a general prohibition on the use of force between states.

https://undocs.org/A/68/98 

/6
This has been reaffirmed by many states, including the US. Its Law of War Manual even has an entire chapter dedicated to “how [IHL] principles and rules apply to relatively novel cyber capabilities”.

/8

https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
So, any state-sponsored cyber operation that would—as mentioned in the article—“destroy whole swaths of [a] country” would certainly fall foul of several of these prohibitions.

/10
This is not to say that the existing law addresses every new problem, but we should refrain from suggesting that cyber operations occur in a legal vacuum.

They do not, and cyberspace is no Wild West.

/end
You can follow @KuboMacak.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.