Why the age caps?

Why the minimums?

How does this need determination tool even work?

Why aren’t clinicians more involved?

What qualifies a care coordinator to assign funding amounts?

Is that needs-based?

Is there an appeal process?

How long is this going to take?

3/12
The only positive that came from @MacLeodLisa’s short tenure as minister was the increased budget.

With more money, it’s possible to help more kids at once .. but only if you spend it.

We know that @ChildrenON has been chronically UNDERspending.

6/12 https://link.medium.com/q8ucNgsgPdb 
Intensity/duration caps were discussed in the report.

NOT age caps.

It’s reasonable to place limits, but AGE shouldn’t be the limiting factor.

That’s not a needs-based approach.

8/12
The determination of need process is a major concern.

@ToddSmithPC wants to put all the power into the hands of a Care Coordinator to assign funding.

A clinician needs to be more involved if we want to ensure needs can actually be met.

9/12
If the funding allotment is disputed, there needs to be a mechanism to appeal the decision.
Clinical assessment of an autistic child should be weighed HIGHER than the button-clicking of a bureaucrat.

Having a dispute mechanism in place could give families piece of mind.

10/12
When @ToddSmithPC says no government has gotten this right - he’s not wrong.

If @ONgov wants to finally fix this thing, it’s time to address the reasonable concerns that parents have.

11/12
With a $600 million budget, a proper needs-assessment, reasonable controls, and therapeutic options, the autism program could finally be something that actually works.

Time to get this done.

@ToddSmithPC @AmyFeePC @JR_Ottawa @fordnation

#AutismDoesntEndAtFord
#onpoli

12/12
You can follow @drpmonaghan.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.