#Constitutional

Thin

thinink

1. I did this y’day on #illegality of #Myanmarcoup & why elected MPs are legal representatives of Myanmar people. Just seen this notice in y'day's Global New Light of Myanmar:-

Randy

Randy_Anglo

Randy's political heroes.Henry VIII starts English modernity by making us a sovereign, self-governing entity. He establishes the absolute power of the King-in-Parliament as the only legitimate jurisdiction in England. Elisabeth

Mulder’s Unapologetic Toxic Masculinity

proteinwisdom

The left isn’t fighting against fascism. Instead, they are fighting FOR authoritarianism. They claim that their political message transcends the law; that it allows them to control cities; that it

Montana

Cream_n_Coffee

1.) Can a former U.S. president be impeached? Can he be convicted?Those are two different constitutional questions. And U.S. President Donald Trump, impeached last week while still in office and—

Christopher Sprigman

CJSprigman

Polk's point about the basic structure of copyright law -- define "infringement" very widely and then rely on the expense of enforcement to constrain the system's impact -- is correct.

Yoni Appelbaum

YAppelbaum

1. So many of our constitutional freedoms trace back to the trauma of the police-state imposed on Boston in the years before Lexington—and lately, I’ve been thinking again about one

Hon. Aden Duale, EGH, MP

HonAdenDuale

THE PLACE OF PARLIAMENT IN THE REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION 1.The Constitution makes it a requirement that Parliament shall publicize any Bill to amend the Constitution and facilitate public discussion

Kimberly A. Hamlin

ProfessorHamlin

(1/6 Thread) Today I am thinking about @helenhgardener, the woman who endured a public sex scandal at 23, changed her name + moved to NYC, and ended up securing Congressional

Steve Schmidt

SteveSchmidtSES

There is an urgent necessity for Congress and the media to investigate if there are ANY security contractors deployed alongside Federal “Agents” thugs in any American city. There should be

Amir Attaran

profamirattaran

This isn't just a loss for the private, for-profits who attacked Canada's Medicare. It's a 3000 paragraph massacre by the judge who ruled against them on every single argument, in

Brett Parker

BrettParker4KS

Speaker Ryckman deciding that only Republicans need be informed he tested positive & was hospitalized for #COVID19 doesn’t crack the top 50 reasons he shouldn’t be re-elected. But while we’re

Peter Beinart

PeterBeinart

During quarantine I spent a lot of time reading Palestinian writing. And I prayed for the humility to hear truths that were sometimes hard to swallow. Since I enjoy an

TheNurembergTrials

IMT_NMTtrials

Time for a thread on the Reichstag fire and how the Nazis used it to consolidate power and eliminate all civil rights in Germany. The Reichstag burned 27 Feb 1933.

Sun_Q_Tzu ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Sun_Q_Tzu

Why would Judge Sullivan hire a lawyer to defend his decision not to dismiss ⁦@GenFlynn⁩ charges after DOJ decided to drop all charges per this WaPo article?Here’s what I think

Robert Saunders

redhistorian

If anyone thinks this is a good faith proposal, designed to secure democratic consent for changes to public monuments, let's look at what Robert Jenrick said four months ago about

divij

divijualsuspect

Twitter routinely blocks, censors, amplifies or promotes online content, which is *integral* to it's functioning. So, why is this particular case so important? A rambling thread. https://twitter.com/divijualsuspect/status/13569153353670

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.