#Constitutional

🇺🇸I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement🇺🇸

TheWiseOwl_AZ

1. Military Intelligence contact continued:. There were 300 arrests that took place yesterday Fri 11 Dec--that was one of the last pieces that needed to be put in place for

WarNuse

WarNuse

'Basic Criminal Law Vs. The Law Of Armed Conflict'Transcribed Exchange Between Lindsey Graham And Brett Kavanaugh From The Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing.This Exchange Will Be KEY In The Coming Years Of

davidallengreen

davidallengreen

Why we need to stop talking about a written constitution- a thread1. I realise that is a provocative way to begin - and that even just saying this will prompt

D Alex

D_Alex_connect

In refusing to hear the Texas case against the four states which had refused to abide by Article II, § 1, cl. 2, the nine #SCOTUS justices committed a wrong

Andy Hessick

AndyHessick

One illustration of the way in which our legal system favors law and order over liberty is in the difference between qualified immunity and the rule of lenity. Both doctrines

Tommy Maguire

RationalPanic

Been quite a week here for NI Protocol. Swathes of clickbait headlines being regurgitated without reading articles. Anecdotal commentary with no evidence or fact being spun to heighten tensions. And

Charles #GetCovered-ba

charles_gaba

#TexasFoldEm: Biden Administration formally REVERSES DoJ stance, tells #SCOTUS the #ACA is still Constitutional w/a $0 penalty & the mandate is absolutely severable:https://acasignups.net/21/02/10/texasfoldem-biden-admin-formally-revers

Vickie Harrell

vharrelle71

This comment is typical: Justice Alito is playing games to allow the PA case to become moot- any SCOTUS opinion would be for clarification of the runoff election or whatever.

Laurence Tribe

tribelaw

1.Ken Gormley says his executive unpardoning idea “might sound strange, even extra-constitutional.” In fact, it wd be UNCONSTITUTIONAL even though I agree a self-pardon, if issued, should be judicially declared

MaryBeth Musumeci

mmusumec

Looking ahead to tomorrow morning’s #SCOTUS hearing in California v. Texas, the case with implications for the #ACA’s ultimate survival, here’s a preview of what to watch: The Court will

Mark R. Levin

marklevinshow

1. I want to thank the lawyers, most of whom are volunteers and many of whom are being threatened, who are working tirelessly through Thanksgiving on the important challenges in

Stephen Robinson

SER1897

Yes, Lincoln was a pushover who was so desperate to bring our “badly divided country” together that he expended political capital on passing a Constitutional amendment banning slavery. That was

Robert Saunders

redhistorian

It is very doubtful, watching today's proceedings, whether the UK can still accurately be described as a "parliamentary democracy". It is, increasingly, an "executive democracy", in which the largest party

Richard A Harrison

RAHarrisonPA

SCOTUS PA CASE PREDICTION: trying to guess what SCOTUS will do in a case like this is a fool's errand, but the Twitterverse keeps asking me what I think, so

Jeff Carlson

themarketswork

1) Congress is incentivized to see Pence's role as passive.But Constitutional scholars differ and/or acknowledge that varying interpretations exist.Note: I am NOT predicting what Pence will do. I will just

Ivan Pentchoukov

IvanPentchoukov

The following 8 paragraphs of legal background in the Texas SCOTUS election case are a fascinating historical context worth sharing in a mini thread: “The individual citizen has no federalconstitutional

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.