#Constitutional

Max Walden

maxwalden_

Excited to announce that I've been asked to be editor of @electionwatch_ until the end of the year - as we look to provide analysis of elections in Australia and

Matthias Goldmann

MattHGoldmann

The BVerfG deserves harsh words for its PSPP verdict. However, AG Tanchev seems to be carrying it a bit far. 1/https://twitter.com/eucourtpress/status/1339505264072994816 Admittedly, Tanchev voices the concerns shared by many

Philippe Lagassé

PhilippeLagasse

The Clerk's comments make seen through the prism of the conventions of responsible government. The PM is constitutionally responsible for all affairs of government. The finance minister's statutory and constitutional

Pwn All The Things

pwnallthethings

So here's the problem. Most (but admittedly not all) of the R reps & sens are signing up for this charade *because they know it will fail*. Their calculus is

Mark Small

marksmall1973

Paul Ogden blogged yesterday about the need for a new Constitution. Like many of my friend’s ideas, they are meant well, but horrible. A Convention can be called by two-thirds

Jacob Remes

jacremes

I have said for a while that climate change is a world-historical challenge and must be our priority. But nothing will happen without democracy. But no matter what happens tomorrow

Ernie Plumley-POTUS WON⭐️⭐️⭐️

ernie_plumley

1 of 7) December 23 will be a important date to watch. Each State must have their electorates submitted by the this date. If they haven’t done so they will

Megan Ryan

Rymegan

I am still awake, anxious about the #Myanmarcoup and people I care deeply about, so I figured I'd write something. First, the coup was not inevitable, but it is also

Alexander Clarkson

APHClarkson

At some point a lot of British commentators and analysts need to come to terms with the fact there is no such thing as an unconditional alliance. This kind of

MJTruth- 0000

MJTruth2

NESARA is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only the United States of America but the whole planet (thus GESARA) in its entire history. The act does away

Seth Abramson

SethAbramson

A question I'd like constitutional scholars to address is whether a senator sitting as a juror in an impeachment trial can decide that the standard of proof for conviction is

Jonathan Ladd

jonmladd

The false but popular notion that all the original writers of the Constitution had conservative and inegalitarian views depends crucially on ignoring Reconstruction, and being able to trust that most

Lady Jaye

LadyJayPersists

Let me stop this argument now. Clearly, too many people never took a civics course and have no idea what Freedom of Speech means.No Constitutional rights were violated when Trump

Tom Pepinsky

TomPepinsky

The point of impeachment is not to unify Americans. The point of impeachment is to punish a criminal who holds office. Constitutional conservatives, Democrats, libertarians, and progressives are at risk

Brian The Great

BrianTh37895972

If Trump had to wait until the constitutional process had failed in the Congress in the courts in the state legislatures then he can play those final cards now with

Nitin Meshram

jaibhimworld

.@pbhushan11. Under which law a Supreme Court can withdraw the powers of Sitting High Court Judge & if there is any precedent, is that not illegal & unconstitutional? 2. Justice

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.