#Scientist

elvis

omarsar0

In case you missed them, here is a thread (in no special order) of some machine learning guides and lists of recommendations I have carefully put together over the last

Judy Chevalier

judy_chevalier

1/ I have been learning from #Tweetablackeconomist but today I am going to tweet a political scientist, @MeganFrancis. Econs should spend more time studying philanthropy in general, but the role

Sam Charrington

samcharrington

It's so frustrating and disappointing to see Google Research discard @timnitGebru like an old garment.Timnit has been such an incredible force for good in AI in so many ways, it's

Calvin Wong Tze Loon 黃子倫 🇲🇾

ithayla

so much writing advice is so bad. vague generalizations that are not actionable - or will turn you into a worse writer, or assume that the same thing works for

Teri Kanefield

Teri_Kanefield

(Thread) The Future of the GOP: Part IThe GOP is on a collision course with time.Its base of voters is aging and shrinking. The GOP has become a white grievance

Mateusz Fafinski

Calthalas

Here we go again. Blatant factual errors, vilification of historians, and the customary oversimplification of the past. The coverage of 'cliometrics' continues to disappoint. As much as it might be

Alina Chan

Ayjchan

Analysis by @edyong209 @TheAtlantic of the impact of the pandemic on how science is done.I'm reading it from the POV of one of "Thousands of researchers dropped whatever intellectual puzzles

🔥 Kareem Carr 🔥

kareem_carr

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT "2+2=5". As a former mathematician, I have things to say. 1/ Statements like "2+2 = 4" are abstractions. What that means is they're generalizations

Gina Gagliano

_GinaGagliano

“A graphic novel on every bookshelf” – that’s the motto of @RHKidsGraphic, the kids and YA graphic novel line from @randomhousekids, which I get to work on, with the amazing

Orlagh

0rlagh

I love hearing other people's stories. The Scientist is (almost) always more interesting than the science. So prepare to be underwhelmed!My merry adventures in science are a bit backwards#IAmAScientist #ScientistsWithoutLabels #WomenIn

The New York Times

nytimes

The bookcase backdrop is ubiquitous this year, with people dialing into video calls from their personal libraries. @nytimesbooks looked at the bookcases of a few celebrities and notable figures. Here’s

Rajan Venkateswaran (സ്വാമി)

swamy64

Since Farming is the hot topic now, let us go back in time.Many know that India was fighting against insufficient food grain production in 1950s. The irrigation dams were being

Martin Modrák

modrak_m

I've spent some time recently arguing the narrow point that "journal publishes only preregistered studies" is NOT a good measure of transparency. So let's also argue a broader point: that

Eric Feigl-Ding

DrEricDing

HUGE: Obesity is a major risk factor for #COVID19 mortality in *MEN* but not in women! This is a key reason we study risk factors in men and women separately.

Rachel "The Doc" Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌

RachelBitecofer

1. It's good to @KatieHill4CA on @MSNBC bc she f'ed up- but it wasn't like she intentionally orphaned 1000s of children, including babies, to psychologically f' w Mexican asylum

Ben W. Ansell

benwansell

Who caused Hard Brexit? Some thoughts from the perspective of a social scientist. In the last few days we have seen an interminable debate on whether Remainers, Soft Brexiters, or

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.