*NotThePopularOpinion, Discover and Read the Best of Twitter Threads by @Only_Grey

*NotThePopularOpinion

Only_Grey

There is nothing more damaging than taking a character and reducing them to a log line. You can't create ideological differences if everyone is, "on the same page"? Really? Ok

People talk about how we need a certain kind of Superman, “given these times” and they make it seem like what we need right now is a Superman that’s gentle

This is not calling out Bailey; this is just an observation.This is the kind of thing the Superman gatekeepers are afraid of. That the image of a Superman that doesn’t

Because it isn’t, “iconic”. It references a specific iteration of the character, one that happens to have been created during the most impressionable years of a certain generations youth. It’s

Trauma - the underlying trauma is at the core of everything that drives him. To me, Bruce is a character always wrestling with that trauma. There are other aspects that

Ya know, aesthetically, I like this. It’s black and red; what’s not to like? But in terms of building a characterization consistent with an entire civilization I can understand why

I understand the appearance of hypocrisay in this; I do. On the surface it seems that people are saying that all the DC films should be made with the Snyder/Ayer

Heres the thing; the word SHOULD means to hold an obigation. So when someone says Superman, “should" not kill they are saying the character is OBLIGATED not to kill, which

Hmmm... one of the points that MovieBob, and others, have made is that the names of some of the Apokolyptan villains are so silly that just saying them reduces them

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.